So this new interview is a wonderful thing indeed. As someone that loves all things Game Boy related, its interesting to hear more on how the system came about, as Okada explains, When I was young, I was rather stubborn and often became angry at my superiors when was trying to defend my ideas. The best example of this was the Game Boy. The Game Boy you know today actually had nothing to do with the one Gunpei Yokoi had in mind. He saw the Game Boy as a direct follow-on from the Game & Watch , which meant a rather cheap toy, without any real business model and no long-term ambition. get moreTo give you a clear comparison, Yokoi wanted a Game Boy that would have looked like the Microvision and would not have lasted more than one or two seasons. For instance, he did not care if there were third-party editors or not. try these outFurthermore, he only wanted quick games, quickly completed and quickly forgotten. I wanted the Game Boy to have more ambition, closer to what the R&D2 had managed to with the Famicom : a machine built to last, with hardware that was good enough to play a variety of quality titles. I was the assistant director of R&D1 and we had many arguments over this.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.forbes.com/sites/olliebarder/2016/12/31/new-interview-with-satoru-okada-delves-into-the-hidden-history-behind-nintendos-gaming-handhelds/